Inside The Lines – My Tennis Journey
Benchmarking your progress-Practice with players you can’t beat
November 27, 2009
Volume 1: issue 2
I don’t like losing. I am not sure I have met anyone who does. However, there are things one can learn from losing. If losing or failure helps you get to the next level, then, there is some merit to losing. It is necessary for winning.
Losing simply becomes part of the process.
Tennis is a sport that forces you to take a different look at losing.
If you enter a tournament, there is only one winner. Everyone else loses. When you play a match, you are the only one on the court and unlike team sports, there is no one else to blame for the loss.
I am reminded of commission sales when I think of tennis. Commission sales are quite pure in this respect: if you make a sale, you get rewarded. If you don’t make sales, you don’t eat. Tennis is similar. If you play well, you have a possibility of winning a match. If you don’t play well, you may still win the match. The key factor to consider, however, is your opponent. You have the opportunity to affect the match, just as a salesperson has an opportunity to affect a sale. I think it is one of the sports that truly promotes personal responsibility. I think that is why I enjoy it so much. Our society needs to emphasize personal responsibility more and steering young people to tennis might inspire that. The topic of personal responsibility is for another time, but I find it interesting that when I look at the team sports and I compare them to tennis and/or golf, is it really a mystery that the popularity of football, baseball, basketball, and to a lesser extent, soccer, reflect the decline in our society’s culture to hold individuals accountable for their actions? I think it is interesting. Nevertheless, today I ponder the idea of losing being beneficial. One way I look at losing in tennis as a benefit is when you have an opportunity to regularly play against players you are not able to beat.
I had a couple of practice sets today that reminded me of the value of losing. I don’t purposely seek out better players to absorb a beat down on the tennis court. It has happened as a by product of my tennis development. I have met many players over the course of the last three and half years. Some of the guys I actually consider friends, which doesn’t make the losing feel any better; but, at least the games are civil. Today I played against two people, neither of whom I have ever played in a real tournament. They are part of a group of players of varying skill levels who meet regularly to play, trade barbs, and give tennis advice. The tennis is good. The camaraderie is better. And, the losing is never welcome. But, the lessons learned after each set is what makes playing worthwhile.
Today’s practice session involved my tennis friends, Nicolas, Alex and Richard. Nicolas and Richard are clearly better players than I. Alex could be better when he figures out that being left handed is an advantage. I play as a left hander, so I have some insight. People tell me all of the time that being “lefty” is an advantage. Some times I can make it work. Part of my growth is to make it work all of the time. Alex and I are very similar in our tennis skills, but I have stepped out and up a bit more and taken more losses than he has. This simply means that I started playing at a higher level with better players sooner than he did. This is why I think at this point in time I am a better player. Plus, Alex does not usually beat me when we play for practice; and, the only time we actually met in a tournament, I won. The tables may turn one day, but not if I can help it.
Practice starting by me playing Nicolas a couple of sets. Nicolas was motivated to play today. I think he remembered the last time we played several weeks ago, I beat him 4-1 in an abbreviated set of “first player to four wins”. I knew on that day Nicolas did not have his “A” game and I played pretty well. Today was another story. Nicolas played very well. The beat down was swift and thorough, efficient, like a surgeon’s knife. His forehand was consistent. His backhand kept me honest and off balance and his serve percentage was high for first serves. He did everything required to beat me and he did. The final score was 6-1, 6-3. I started to make some progress in the second set, but Nicolas was too good for me on this day. However, I learned something about my game. I have to look for more opportunities to attack to play at the next level. Nicolas is probably a good 4.0 player. He tends to stand on the baseline, but his ground strokes are very aggressive. He can hit the corners and his backhand is a weapon to set up the big forehand. I was on the defensive for most of both sets. Even when I hit what I thought was a good offensive shot, Nicolas was adept at turning it into an offensive shot for him. I lost both sets, but I fought hard and I knew it took Nicolas playing well to win. If I play against my peers the way I played against Nicolas, I will win a fair share of matches.
Richard has a nickname amongst our group that is fitting for his style of play. We refer to him as “The Great Wall of Merritt”. Playing with Richard is like hitting against a wall. He will get every ball back unless you move him around and execute a winning shot on the opening you create. It is easier said than done. I had the pleasure of playing Richard a set today. I had not played Richard in a long time. It may have been last year. I don’t remember. What I do remember is that he waxed me pretty good. It was probably 6-0, but who really wants to remember the bagel? What I remember from that beat down is that I could not hit a second serve, my forehand was very erratic and I frankly did not have enough consistency to compete. Richard is consistent and mentally tough. Those are his weapons. He hits decent ground strokes and his serve is serviceable, but if you looked at Richard from the sidelines, you might think, “I can beat this guy.” It looks different when you are on the court with him. Nevertheless, today I realized my game had improved. I lost to Richard 6-4. I would not be exaggerating if I stated that I should have won. I had a 4-2 lead and multiple chances to stay in the set, including serving at 4-5 to push it. But, I did not execute good enough when it was absolutely needed. I played well, but at crucial times I made some errors that I would need to avoid when playing someone as consistent as Richard. Richard outsmarted me. He did the same thing I did to my opponent the other night. He decided when he was down 2-4 to make me hit more balls and force me to make the errors. The strategy worked, because when I started going for winners to finish off the point, even after some extended rallies, I made errors. There are still some shots I can occasionally hit, but I don’t own them yet. When I start gaining consistency on those shots I intend to hit as winners, I will be a difficult opponent. Until then, I will play close sets, but I will not win. The goal is to win. This means I have to work on my strokes even more.
I lost today to Nicolas and Richard, but they exposed some things in my game that I can use to motivate me for the next practice session. Losing is not fun, but learning is.
It is okay to benchmark your progress, even by playing with those you can’t beat…yet!
Tennis and Life coupled like man and wife.
A commitment to excellence takes hard work and may cause pain.
Some days will be sunny. Other days may bring rain.
And when the story is told by others and it is time to reflect,
Life will teach how to forgive. Tennis allows you to play a “let”.
Copyright © 2009 Milton A. Brown